Moderator: Squire
Squire wrote:Sometimes I think our fellow enthusiasts seek new over tried and true. A solid product at a decent price just seems too common to comment but there are hyped NDP labels out there that can only aspire to reach what WT does everyday.
Mike wrote:Squire wrote:Sometimes I think our fellow enthusiasts seek new over tried and true. A solid product at a decent price just seems too common to comment but there are hyped NDP labels out there that can only aspire to reach what WT does everyday.
You nailed me, Squire, but maybe not so much as I once did. There are,as you suggest, some 'gimmick' bourbons out there and I am a bit more reluctant to try new labels for that reason. You are certainly right about WT bourbons........ none are disappointments in my experience.
RandyG wrote:Just finished off a Four Roses 2012 Ltd. Ed. Small Batch. Hated to see it go but loved the journey!
Bourbon Joe wrote:I have had both good and bad bottles of McKenna. When they are good, they're very good. The bad ones are terrible. The last time we were at Heaven Hill, we rejected all 10 barrels of McKenna. They were not happy. But, shit happens.
RandyG wrote:Just opened my first bottle of McKenna. Wasn't impressed at first but it grew on me. I doubt I will buy another though.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests